Liver fibrosis staging using CT image texture analysis and soft computing
Göster/ Aç
Erişim
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessTarih
2014Yazar
Kayaalti, OmerAksebzeci, Bekir Hakan
Karahan, Ibrahim Okkes
Deniz, Kemal
Ozturk, Mehmet
Yilmaz, Bulent
Kara, Sadik
Asyali, Musa Hakan
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını gösterÖzet
Liver biopsy is considered to be the gold standard for analyzing chronic hepatitis and fibrosis; however, it is an invasive and expensive approach, which is also difficult to standardize. Medical imaging
techniques such as ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging are
non-invasive and helpful methods to interpret liver texture, and may be good alternatives to needle
biopsy. Recently, instead of visual inspection of these images, computer-aided image analysis based
approaches have become more popular. In this study, a non-invasive, low-cost and relatively accurate
method was developed to determine liver fibrosis stage by analyzing some texture features of liver CT
images. In this approach, some suitable regions of interests were selected on CT images and a comprehensive set of texture features were obtained from these regions using different methods, such as Gray
Level Co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), Laws’ method, Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), and Gabor filters.
Afterwards, sequential floating forward selection and exhaustive search methods were used in various
combinations for the selection of most discriminating features. Finally, those selected texture features
were classified using two methods, namely, Support Vector Machines (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors
(k-NN). The mean classification accuracy in pairwise group comparisons was approximately 95% for both
classification methods using only 5 features. Also, performance of our approach in classifying liver fibrosis
stage of subjects in the test set into 7 possible stages was investigated. In this case, both SVM and k-NN
methods have returned relatively low classification accuracies. Our pairwise group classification results
showed that DWT, Gabor, GLCM, and Laws’ texture features were more successful than the others; as
such features extracted from these methods were used in the feature fusion process. Fusing features from
these better performing families further improved the classification performance. The results show that
our approach can be used as a decision support system in especially pairwise fibrosis stage comparisons.