Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Çağatay
dc.contributor.authorAli, Hafiz Qasim
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T12:40:38Z
dc.date.available2022-06-30T12:40:38Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn0142-9418
dc.identifier.issn1873-2348
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000799991800003
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107612
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/1299
dc.description.abstractComposites are well-known and widely used materials due to their anisotropic nature and high strength-to-weight ratio; therefore, the mechanical performance of these materials is crucial. Precise tensile testing is essential to obtain material properties that are crucial for the design stage of composite structures. This study is an effort to investigate the effect of adhesive materials used for tabbing process, which is necessary for the tensile testing procedure. Araldite and AF 163-2k film are used as the adhesive film, whereas in the case of AF 163-2k, tabbing is done through two different procedures (Jig and corner holes method). Apart from the tensile performance, strain distribution and damage progression are monitored simultaneously using digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE) analysis. It is observed that there is no significant difference in the ultimate tensile strength of these composites tabbed with different adhesives and procedures. Nevertheless, the first major failure strength is much higher in Araldite tabbed specimens compared to AF 163-2k film (the first major failure activity is defined as a point at which material loses its integrity, especially when considering structural or aerospace applications). Also, strain distribution throughout the gauge length recorded via DIC is appreciably different, which is attributed to damage accumulation and progression monitored by AE analysis. The frequency-based analysis of AE data is performed to classify the damage, and cumulative energy is correlated with the DIC to navigate the failure activity at different times and stress levels.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSabancı1 Üniversitesi Entegre İmalat Teknolojileri Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezien_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107612en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesiveen_US
dc.subjectTabbingen_US
dc.subjectDigital image correlation (DIC)en_US
dc.subjectAcoustic emission (AE)en_US
dc.subjectDamage progressionen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different tabbing methods on the damage progression and failure of carbon fiber reinforced composite material under tensile loadingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-1626-5858en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorYılmaz, Çağatay
dc.identifier.volume111en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage10en_US
dc.relation.journalPolymer Testingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster